
(Prepared by Angela Blann-10/00; updated by sjh 04/26/01)
Web version of this guide includes links to web resources.
A look at the history of and the necessity for video surveillance and interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications in criminal investigations.
FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. Vol. 69, No. 2 February 2000 pp. 25-32
J 1.14/8:69/2
This article examines the digital monitoring and control in employment that is now made possible by advances in information technology.
Civilization. August/September 1999 pp. 53-55
LC 1.52:1999/8-9
This document offers research done by the Office of Law Enforcement Standards to help law enforcement personnel select the video surveillance equipment that is most
appropriate for their needs. 1999
J 28.8:V 66
This article examines ways to prevent covert recording in the federal workplace and the relevant laws and regulations regarding this practice.
The Army Lawyer. Pamphlet 27-50-327 February 2000 pp. 22-23
D 101.22:27-50-327
This hearing attempts to find out why telecommunications carriers are not able to comply with CALEA requirements by listening to both sides of a dispute between the FBI
and the industry. CALEA requires telecommunications carriers to provide equipment capable of intercepting the content of electronic communications and of delivering the
information to law enforcement. 1997
Y 4.J 89/1:105/136
Statistics presented by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts detailing the number and nature of federal and state applications for orders authorizing wiretapping. Details include the offense under investigation; the location of intercept; cost data; and the resulting number of arrests, trials, and convictions.
This hearing discusses wireless telephone eavesdropping; law enforcement's use of wiretaps; the effectiveness of current, related laws; the future of wireless
technology; and other issues surrounding wireless privacy. 1997
Y 4.C 73/8:105-22
This Office of Technology Assessment background paper reviews the progress of the telecommunications industry and law enforcement agencies in implementing the
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) and the technical factors affecting compliance. Appendices include a section-by-section summarization of CALEA and
electronic surveillance requirements keyed to CALEA. 1995
Y 3.T 22/2:12 EL 2
This California Research Bureau publication on the web is also publication 179953 from the National Criminal Justice Research Service. It provides an historical overview of public video surveillance in crime deterrence; examines legal issues, international development, and contemporary usage in the U.S.; and explores legislative and administrative options. 1997
An annual report summarizing the number of reported eavesdropping devices used by law enforcement personnel in Illinois by county. Statistics include information on
location, results, requesting agency, and type of offense.
ILLINOIS 363.252 REPO 2 1999
A look at eavesdropping legislation from an Illinois perspective, including its necessity and its consequences.
Illinois Bar Journal. Vol. 87, No. 7 July 1999 pp. 362-367
This article examines Fourth Amendment implications of new surveillance technology, particularly regarding technology used by law enforcement personnel in the apprehension
of criminals perpetrating drug crimes.
American Criminal Law Review. Vol. 37, No. 1 Winter 2000 pp. 127-143
This article looks at case law relating to state wiretapping laws and interspousal wiretapping and compares the state laws to the federal statute.
Brandeis Law Journal. Vol. 37, No. 3 Spring 1998-99 pp. 415-434
The author of this article argues that video surveillance of a mother suspected of causing illness in her child is unethical, as "catching the suspect in the act" inflicts
further harm on the child.
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. Vol. 32, Issue 1 Fall 1998 pp. 105-194
This article compares federal and state eavesdropping statutes and offers Appendices containing state constitutional provisions and statutes; a chart of state information
regarding consent, trial, and sentencing; and state statutory language requiring the consent of all parties.
DePaul Law Review. Vol. 47, No. 4 Summer 1998 pp. 837-942
For collected cases on electronic surveillance topics, consult the ALR Index under the heading, Eavesdropping and Wiretapping
Updated semiannually, this two-volume set offers a thorough overview of the law of electronic surveillance, its historical development, and the ramifications of Title III
of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. Surveillance without a court order, content of surveillance orders, usage of intercepted information, criminal
penalties involved, and foreign intelligence surveillance are examined.
KF 9670 .C37 1986 v. 1 & 2