
(Prepared by -Meg Finson 7/99; revised 2/00)
Web version of this guide includes links to web resources.
Provides numbers regarding states that have prohibited assisted suicide as well as a look at the medical, legal, and ethical issues that it involves. Statements are
given by many physicians, including Dr. Quill of Quill v. Vacco, among others.. 1996
Y 4.J89/1:104/78
Studies legal developments and policy arguments in the Netherlands, while reviewing its history of assisted suicide and euthanasia. 1996
Y 4.J89/1:P56
Discusses the ethical and the economical aspects of medical interventions for dying patients. A look at the patient Self-Determination Act to see how it is working and
how it might be approved. 1994
Y 4.F49:S.HRG.103-1008
This familiarizes individuals with the living will and the durable power of an attorney for health care, features the advantages and the disadvantages of each, and
provides drafting suggestions. Included is a state-by-state analysis of statutes authorizing living wills and durable powers of an attorney. 1992
Y 4.AG 4:S.PRT.102-106
A hearing to discuss how to best educate the public on current State laws regarding advance directives. 1990
Y 4.F 49:S.HRG.101-1168
Asks and attempts to answer the question "Should assisted suicide be paid for with Federal dollars?" This document includes the testimony of Dr. Henk Jockemsen,
an expert on the Dutch experience with assisted suicide, as well as a moving statement submitted by Dr. C Everett Koop, former U.S. Surgeon General. 1997
Y 4.C 73/8:105-7
A bibliography of books and articles on living wills. 1991
ILLINOIS 016.344041 SMIT
This entire issue is devoted to physician-assisted suicide and includes a speech given by the leading proponent of physician-assisted death, Dr. Timothy Quill. Other
speeches deliver the American Medical Perspective on physician-assisted suicide and analyze public policy.
University of Detroit Mercy Law Review Spring 1998 Vol. 75, No. 3
Provides data about behavior of physicians when a patient refuses life support and concludes that a physician who ignores a patient's refusal of life supporting
technology should be held liable for compensatory damages. Reviews law that governs damage actions for unconsented life support and compares decisions
involving wrongful life claims.
UCLA Law Review February 1998 Vol. 45, No. 3 pp. 674-732
This entire issue is devoted to physician-assisted suicide, including a critique of Oregon's Death with Dignity Act, a paper in opposition to physician-assisted
suicide from the National Council on Disability, and a thorough examination of the history of assisted suicide and euthanasia in the Netherlands.
Issues in Law and Medicine Winter 1998 Vol. 14, No. 3
Author argues that, when considering the responsibility or morality of certain acts with the same outcomes, intentions should matter. Since those physicians assisting
suicide intend for their patient to die by their administrations, their intention conflicts with the "do not kill" standard. 1997
Issues in Law and Medicine Vol. 13, No. 2 pp. 145-171
Addressing the Americans with Disabilities Act, this article examines quality-of-life considerations for people with disabilities and contends that laws legalizing the
taking of life "send a false signal that a less than perfect life is not worth living" . 1997
DePaul Law Review Vol. 46, No. 4 pp. 987-1002
An introduction to physician-assisted suicide and a guide to available resources about the topic. 1996
Legal Research Guides Vol. 26
LEGL REF KF 241.T67 D47
This Supreme Court decision reversed a 9th Circuit decision that found the right to commit assisted suicide was protected by the Due Process Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment. 1997
138 L.Ed 2d 772
An overall view of State treatment of euthanasia, right to die, durable power of attorney, and living wills presented in an easy-to-read chart format
with statute cites provided.
LEGL REF KF 386 .N38 1997 pp. 441-496 at Gov. Pubs. desk
Precise definitions of killing and allowing to die are formed, along with descriptions of the traditional view of each, in an effort to make a clear distinction
between the two. This author contends that, if this distinction can be made, the real issues regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia involve
society's views of morality, intention, and causation. 1998
The Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics Vol. 26, No. 1 Spring 1998 pp.55-64
This article explores an incapacitated patient's use of a preappointed surrogate to make medical decisions, such as the decision to forego life-sustaining treatment.
The history of the right to die for incapacitated patients, including In re Quinlan and Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, is
examined and current Illinois, New Mexico, and Ohio surrogate decision-making statutes are reviewed.
The Elder Law Journal. Vol. 7, No. 1 1999 pp. 153-183
This article examines and comments upon arguments made in Richard Epstein's book, Mortal Peril The author of this article agrees with Epstein's assertion
that there is no moral difference between euthanasia and treatment withdrawal, but contends that a physician-induced coma and patient-requested food and water
withdrawal together is euthanasia. The more appropriate question, then, is whether a right to assisted suicide exists if there is a right to euthanasia by
terminal sedation.
University of Illinois Law Review. Vol. 1998, No. 3 pp. 837-860