
(Revised -- 7/06)
Web version of this guide includes links to web resources.
The RAND study that was instrumental in the Secretary of Defense Executive Order to end discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in the Armed Forces. 1993
This GAO study reports that over a 10-year period, it could have cost the Department of Defense about 95 million dollars in constant FY2004 dollars to replace servicemembers separated under the military's current homosexual conduct policy. It is estimated that it cost the Army, Navy, and Air Force $29.7 million, $48.8 million, and $16.6 million, respectively. 2005
This Army website offers the Army's policy on homosexuality, namely, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell".
A look at Australia, Canada, Israel, and Britain's treatment of lifting the gay ban to military service and the relevance these decisions have for the U.S.
Parameters. Vol. 33, No. 2 Summer 2003 pp.108-119
D 101.72:33/2
This article examines military regulation of homosexuality, speech, and marriage and makes an anology to conduct permitted in civilian government employment. It seeks to
answer whether or not the military can discharge homosexuals, constitutionally speaking and, if so, whether they should continue this practice.
The Air Force Law Review. Vol. 46, 1999 pp. 1-71
D 302.9:999
This look at the changing pressures on military culture argues that military culture be allowed to remain "different, but not separate" from civil culture and that the
military should be allowed to nurture its uniqueness that is an inherent part of its efficient operation. A historical perspective is gained by looking at military ideology
during the Cold War and post-Cold War eras. Social forces at work on military life include issues such as women in combat, homosexuals in the military, gender-integrated
basic training, and interaction between civilian and military cultures.
Parameters. Vol. 29, No. 3 Autumn 1999 pp. 9-23
D 101.72:29/3
This Department of Defense publication reviews DoD's findings regarding homosexuals in the military and includes data on discharge, application and enforcement of the onduct policy, recommendations, investigations, and threats against homosexuals. 1998
This report gives the background of the group selected to investigate the feasibility of lifting the ban on homosexuals in the military, the group's findings, conclusions,
recommended policy, and the resulting memo from the Secretary of Defense outlining the accepted policy. 1993
D 1.2: H 75 and D 1.2:H 75/2
This dictionary is useful in understanding the major arguments against and for the inclusion of homosexuals in the military, and it offers plenty of legal cases and their
mixed results.
LEGL REF KF 4754.5 .A68 S74 2001
This author proposes that courts give greater attention if a classification can be likened to the classifications of race or sex when proving a point of law.
He illustrates his belief that the visibility factor in antidiscrimination law cannot be justified by showing that the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy renders
gays invisible and powerlessness from a legal standpoint.
The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 108, No. 3 December 1998 pp. 485-571
An examination of whether a state military entity is required to abide by the federal government's imposition of the "Don't ask, Don't tell" policy. This situation
results in the federalization of a state militia versus a state's rights. 1997.
California Law Review. Vol. 5, No. 4 p. 955
This is a typical case brought against federal and state defendants resulting from a sexual orientation discharge. The violations presented are Lieutenant
Holmes' right of equal protection, the freedom of speech, and violation of rights under the California constitution.
920 F. Supp. 1510
This case is another typical example of a military officer discharged under the "Don't ask, Don't tell" policy.
80 F.3rd 915
A review of First Amendment rights and how they relate to the "Don't ask, Don't tell" policy. It also presents the unique problems inherent in a First Amendment rights
case involving the military, because the military is considered a separate entity from the civilian population. 1996.
Yale Law Journal. Vol. 106, No. 2 p.531
This article critiques the case of Holmes vs. California Army National Guard with regard to First Amendment rights. In addition, it explains the "Don't ask,
Don't tell" policy and how it is supposed to work. 1998.
Harvard Law Review. Vol. 111, No. 5 p.1371
This book presents cases, statutory material, and articles about equal protection and the military service ban, while tying the topic into the larger issue of homosexuality
and equal protection in our society. 1997
LEGL REF KF 4754.5 .H64 1997 v.2
This treatise is kept timely via supplements and offers comprehensive legal information regarding homosexuality. Chapter 7 specifically addresses what it means to be a
homosexual in the military or a homosexual veteran. Its coverage includes policy over the years, discharge, and AIDS.
LEGL REF KF 4754.5 .S49 1985 v.1