
(Prepared by Andrea Hayes - 3/99; revised 6/06)
Web version of this guide includes links to web resources.
A discussion of factors that may contribute to infertility. The role stress plays in infertility is examined and statistics are given. 1996.
HE 20.3007/3:48/6
Possible treatments for the infertile couple are examined: fertility drugs, artificial insemination, and other techniques. Tips on preventing
reproductive problems, choosing a doctor, and testing for infertility are also included. 1991.
HE 20.4010:25/4
A discussion of the progress made and the problems existing in the field of reproductive technology, including a call to certify embryo laboratories. 1992.
Y4.EN 2/3:102-120
This hearing explores contraception research and infertility and the federal role in such efforts. 1990.
Y4.EN 2/3:101-141
This data addresses questions about assisted reproducive technology success rates and treatment locations. The 2003 ART success rate report is published based on geographic region and includes a national report and fertility clinic reports by state. 2003.
This article defines infertility and gives some possible methods to treat it as well as a few of the reasons that infertility might exist. Common tests given to both sexes are explained, artificial reproductive technology is explored, and a list of FDA-approved drugs is included. 1997.
This interview with Lori Andrews, health law expert, discusses the legal and ethical implications of medical advances in genetics and reproductive technology.
Trial. July 1999 pp. 20-31
This article examines disputes surrounding the disposition of frozen embryos and preconception agreements. Case law indicates that courts are awarding the disputed embryos
to the party wishing to avoid procreation. The author, believing that this practice diminishes women's control over their early embryos, offers an alternative.
American Journal of Law and Medicine. Vol. 25, No. 4 1999 pp.455-477
This Act mandates reporting of pregnancy success rates of assisted reproduction and certification of embryo laboratories. 1992.
106 STAT. 3146, P.L. 102-493
An analysis of U.S. court cases involving reproductive technologies and their implications on reproductive choice, mothers' versus fathers' rights, definitions
and evaluations of parenting, and the nuclear family structure. 1997.
LEGL REF KF478 .A45 G45 1997 v.2
This article addresses whether excluding coverage for infertility treatments and abortion from employer-provided health insurance violates the Americans with
Disabilities Act and considers whether infertility and abortion are disabilities.
American Journal of Law and Medicine. Vol.22, No. 1, pp. 51-84. 1996.
This article makes recommendations promoting predictability and protecting consumers' ability to make rational and informed choices about insurance coverage and
about In Vitro Fertilization treatment. Common law approaches to question coverage for IVF treatment and consumer protection issues are examined .
Harvard Law Review. vol. 109, No. 8, pp. 2092-2109. 1996
A look at the different types of lawsuits arising from reproductive technology and how the legal system is dealing with them. Some of the cases mentioned involve
surrogacy, post-mortem insemination, motherly intent, and parental identification.
National Law Journal. Vol. 17, issue 38 p. 1A. May 22, 1995.
This article looks at whether infertility is considered to be a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Two pro cases and two con cases are analyzed and
the ramifications of the debate on health care costs are examined.
National Law Journal. Vol. 19, issue 26 p. C1. February 24, 1997.
"This article focuses on consumer policy questions raised by assisted reproduction and discusses the potential role of public and private groups in addressing uncertainties.
It gives recent events that illustrate the need for policies that protect consumers who are considering infertility treatment options.
Trial. Vol. 31, No. 12 p. 28-33. December 1995.
Advances in reproductive technologies are impacting inheritance laws. This article examines the permissibility and consequences of bequeathing gametes, zygotes, preembryos
and embryos and concludes that they are property and, thus, bestowable.
DePaul Law Review. Vol. 47, No. 4 Summer 1998 pp. 743-818
This Note argues that the right to procreate protects procreative acts and, thus, includes assisted reproduction.
Columbia Law Review. Vol. 98, No. 6 October 1998 pp.1461-1515
The article explains gestational surrogacy and the possible risks of each party, including altered agreements.
Trial. Vol. 33, No. 8 p. 38-42. August 1997
The author proposes that cloning should not be banned in the U.S., only regulated. This article analyzes how cloning works and how it might be applied to existing
reproductive technologies, Federal and State prohibitive legislation, and foreseeable legislative shortcomings, while offering guidelines for use in developing legislation.
John Marshall Law Review. Vol. 31, No. 2 pp. 1385-1422 Summer 1998