
(Prepared by Doug Ellerman - 2/97; updated 5/98; revised 6/06)
Web version of this guide includes links to web resources.
This tells about some of the ethical problems and conclusions that can be drawn from assisted suicide. 1985.
Y3. T22/2: 2L62/v.3/Ethical/fiche MICROFICHE
Gives examples of how assisted suicide has changed in the Netherlands. It also implies what will happen if the U.S. legalizes physician-assisted suicide. 1996.
Y4. J89/1: P56
A proposal to amend the Controlled Substances Act to advocate pain management without the use of assisted suicide and euthanasia. 1999
Y 4.L 11/4:S. HRG. 106-222
A bill offered to clarify the federal position that intentionally providing a controlled substance with the intent to cause the suicide or the euthanasia of any
individual is not a legitimate medical purpose and that doing so invites the revocation or suspension of drug dispensation licensing. 1998
Y 4.J89/1:105/123
This report reviews physician-assisted suicide as legally practiced in the Netherlands and argues that the Dutch program results in lessening of medical options
and often reduces a patient's involvement in the decision to terminate life. 1993
Current Issues Source File (Library CD-ROM Network) A136-3
This article opposes the current trend toward euthanasia of certain terminally ill patients. Author describes her personal experiences with her father's terminal
illness to illustrate the medical profession's eagerness to withhold life-sustaining treatments in certain cases, even in cases where the patient expresses a strong
desire to live. 1995
Current Issues Source File (Library CD-ROM Network) A252-7
This article discusses recent events relating to physician-assisted suicide, including a ruling by a District Court judge in Washington State. The author criticizes the
judge for attempting to rewrite a state statute, a responsibility reserved for legislators, and implies that legalization might foster increased pressure by doctors or
family members to end life. 1994
Current Issues Source File (Library CD-ROM Network) R128-4
This article talks about the concept of integrity as it applies to physicians, then asks whether it is a violation of professional integrity for a physician to assist in
the suicide of a terminally ill patient. The authors argue that, as a general rule, the practice of assisting suicide does violate an established norm of professional integrity,
but can be justified in certain cases as a "last resort." 1995
Current Issues Source File (Library CD-ROM Network) R128-13
Speeches and articles sparked by the recent Supreme Court rulings against physician-assisted suicide, including a speech from Dr. Quill (of Vacco v. Quill).
University of Detroit Mercy Law Review. Vol. 75 No. 3--Entire Issue--Spring 1998.
Gives judges' rulings about assisted suicide and also tells the differences between assisted death and euthanasia.
Trial. Vol. 30. No. 12. pp. 30-35. December 1994.
This is a brief article that talks about certain suicide appeals and other top issues that go against the legal norms.
The National Law Journal. Vol. 18. No. 34. p. A6. April 22, 1996.
Gives explanations of specific court cases dealing with physician-assisted suicide.
ABA Journal. Vol. 82. pp. 42-44. May 1996.
A look at the problems elders face when they get very sick, including the obstacles in choosing to die because of severe pain and suffering.
American Journal of Law and Medicine. Vol. 19. No. 3. pp. 233-283. Fall 1993.
A research guide featuring useful legal and non-legal material available on the topic of physician-assisted suicide.
Legal Reference KF 241. T67 D47 1996
This unanimous Supreme Court decision reversed a 2nd Circuit decision that allowed physicians to prescribe medications to be self-administered by terminally ill, mentally competent patients. The Court disagreed with the lower court's opinion that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was violated by the state statute. The Court makes the distinction between "allowing someone to die" and "causing someone to die."
This Supreme Court decision reversed a 9nd Circuit decision that found the right to commit assisted suicide was protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court held that "not any and all important, intimate, and personal decisions" are fundamental liberty interests protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, and that the State has an interest in preserving and protecting human life.
This article analyzes landmark assisted suicide cases and contends that there is no constitutional right, federal or state, to assisted suicide.
Issues In Law and Medicine. Vol. 15, No. 1 Summer 1999 pp. 3-86
Oregon is the only state currently allowing physician assisted suicide. This article looks at recent federal and state cases and their differing outcomes.
Trial. Vol. 35, No. 7 July 1999 pp. 44-50
This article asserts that society, the legal system, and a profit-driven health care system discriminate against persons with disabilities and that legalized assisted
suicide invites the idea that it is acceptable to kill those who are not perfect without an examination of other options.
Human Rights.Vol. 27, No. 1 Winter 2000 pp. 6-8
The 'Philosophers' Brief', submitted to the Supreme Court in its consideration of Washington v. Glucksburg and Vacco v. Quill, stipulates that
individuals have a constitutional right to arrange the intimate details of their life. The author of this reply argues to the contrary.
Issues in Law and Medicine. Vol. 15, No. 2 Fall 1999 pp. 159-179