The Reviewers (indicated in green on the accompanying schematic) each receive copies of formal proposals from the Alliances. They review the proposals from technical, security, risk, liability, legal, ethical, regulatory, policy, and procedural perspectives. Their comments will become part of the proposals as they moves forward through the IT Governance workflow process.
The reviewers use their staff resources as necessary to assist in evaluating potential risks and issues. In some cases, existing IT-related committees also assist in the proposal review process.
If the Executive Committee determines that the reviewers have raised significant issues, it will route the proposal back to the Alliance from which it originated and ask them to address the issue(s). On the other hand, if no significant issues were identified, the Executive Committee forwards the proposal to the IT Governance Council.
IT Governance Proposal Reviewers
- Dan Romano (Director of University Technology) reviews proposals from an Infrastructure perpective
- Richard Chamberlain (Exec Director, Technology User Support Services) reviews proposals from an support perspective
- Brenda Parks (Director of Administrative Information Management Systems) reviews proposals from an Enterprise Resource Program perspective
- Robert Emmert (Director of Electronic Student Services) reviews proposals from a student services perspective
- Rita Moore (Director of Internal Auditing) reviews proposals from an regulatory and compliance perspective
- Christopher David (Assistant Director, QC Technology Support Services) reviews proposals from the QC campus perspective
- Christopher Martin (Engineer, Facilities Management - Facility Plan & Construction)
- Andrea Henderson (Director, Equal Opportunity and Access) reviews proposals from EOA/Accessibility perspective
- Tammy Irwin (Office Manager, AIMS/ Reviewer Committee Assistant)
- Other individuals and/or committees as required
Questions? Click here to send an email to AskITGov@wiu.edu .