Final Exam Test Questions: Western Political Thought |
Final Exam is Scheduled for December 15th
This is meant as a study guide. Obviously if you have questions
about any of our readings or my lectures I will try to answer
them. Because this is a study guide, it is your responsibility
to find the answers to the following questions. The exam questions will not necessarily follow the
exact wording of the questions here, but I can assure you that if
you know the answers to the questions below you will do well on
the exam. I wish you well in your studies.
I. Short Identification Questions
- What are Natural Rights?
- What does Rousseau mean by the "General Will"?
- What is a Social Contract?
- What is the State of Nature?
- Who is the sovereign in Rousseau's political theory?
- What does Roussea mean by "Man is born free and yet
everwhere he is chains"?
- Who is Charles I, and why is he important?
- What is the Exclusion Crisis?
- What is the Free Market?
- What is Civic Humanism or Republicanism?
- Who is Lorenzo de' Medici, the Magnificent?
- What does Fortuna mean?
- Why is Machiavelli concerned about mercenary and/or
auxiliary soldiers?
- What is the labor theory of value?
- Why is Gold so crucial in Locke's theory?
- Why is Machiavelli classified as a modern political
theorist?
- Discuss Machiavelli's analysis of violence in the
political process.
- What is Mill's "One Simple Principle?"
- Describe the "legislator" and his role in Rousseau.
- What does Rousseau mean by the "General Will"?
- What do Mill and Rousseau mean by "participatory democracy"?
- What is new about the modern threat to liberty according to Mill?
- What does Rousseau mean by community?
- How does Mill differentiate between "dead dogmas" and "living truths"?
- What are the basic component of non-violent protest according to M. L. King?
- How does M. L. King justify political protest in his letter?
II. Essay Questions for Short and Long Questions
- What does the concept of human nature mean? Take two
theorists that we have discussed and compare and
contrast their discussions of human nature. Why do
political theorists discuss human nature?
- What does the "social contract" mean? Take two
political theorists that we have discussed and compare
and contrast their views on the social contract. Why
do these theorists make use of the social contract in
their theories?
- Compare and contrast the discussions of the state and
its role in the theorists that we have discussed. What
powers do these theorists give to the state? What
checks, if any, do these theorists place on the power
of the state?
- What does the concept of legitimacy mean? Why is this
concept implicit or explicit in the discussions of some
of the political theorists we have discussed?
- How are the concepts of consent and options related to
the idea of free will? How does the language of
choice fit into this, and why is it important?
- Machiavelli talks a great deal about how
to maintain power and control in a province or state.
Is he concerned about public opinion and public
acceptance of the sovereign's power?
- John Locke and J. S. Mill are both classified as
liberal political theorists, yet there are considerable
differences between them. Why are they classified as
liberals? Where do they depart from each other in the
liberal tradition?
- What is a free market? What does it imply in terms of
the relation between individual citizens and buyers and
the larger society and government? Why is it an
important component of John Locke's political theory?
- Contrast and compare Machiavelli in the Discourses with
Machiavelli in the Prince. What are the similarities
and differences between these two works?
- What sort of evidence do Rousseau and Locke offer in
support of their views on human nature? How would you
evaluate the evidence? That is, do they do a good job
defending their picture of human nature?
- Are the theorists we have discussed starting with Machiavelli democratic
theorists? Are they within the tradition of democratic
theory? Take two theorists and discuss their democratic
credentials?
- Both Locke and Rousseau portray humans as "equal" in the
state of nature. What do they mean by equality? How
do their views on equality influence their views of the
state?
- How are the concepts of legitimacy, rights, consent,
and the social contract linked together in liberal
theory? In answering this question, you need to first
define what each term means individually and then
discuss how they are related.
- One of the areas where Machiavelli has drawn the
sharpest criticism is on his defense of what has been
called a "dual standard of morality" or the problem of
"dirty hands." What are the issues in dispute here? Does Machiavelli
warrant the criticism that he has received?
- Is Rousseau a totalitarian or a democrat? Examine the main
elements of his theory and discuss whether his ideas are a threat to
a democratic society or would reinforce such a society.
- Mill argues in the latter part of "On Liberty" that society has the right
to regulate the individual's moral behavior and conduct in life.
How can and does society regulate an individual's behavior? Why is
society justified in doing this, according to Mill?
- Let's suppose Machiavelli visited the later part of the twentieth century.
Discuss his reaction to Iraq and Saddam Hussein's defiance of
U N inspectors? What would he recommend to U S policy makers? What
sorts of issues would Machiavelli raise about our policy?
- What does Mill see as the greatest threat to our liberty? What does
he mean by the "Tyranny of the Majority"? How does the majority tyrannize the individual?
- What does Rousseau mean by the General Will? How is it different than the majority will?
In his discussion of the General Will, he talks about "forcing people to be free." What does
he mean by that, and is that an attack on liberty and freedom?
- Rousseau differentiates between natural inequality and social and political inequality.
What does he mean by the distinction, and is the distinction an important one?
- Differentiate between the views of Rousseau and Mill on the issue of women in society
and in politics. You should relate your answers to such themes as equality, participation,
democracy and human nature.
- What is the liberal "quandary"? Discuss two of the theorists we have focused on in the
course and analyze their ideas in the terms of this quandary. As you analyze the contemporary
American political scene, does the "liberal quandary" offer any insight or grounds for thought?
- Why does Mill give liberty such priority as a political value? How does he argue that liberty
is a value worth protecting?
- Rousseau is seen by many writers as a critic of liberalism. Is that true? Where are Rousseau's
ideas consistent with liberalism and where do they depart?
- Imagine that you are Rousseau or Mill and that you have been dragged into the 20th century
in Helm's time machine. What would they have to say about modern society? Would they think that we have progressed or deteriorated from when they wrote?
- Liberty and equality as values are frequently viewed as being in tension with each other. Where
do they reinforce each other, and where do they conflict? Can we resolve the tensions between them?
- Differentiate between Rousseau and Locke in terms of their theories
of the "state of nature." Why are their accounts of the state of nature
so important to their theories? In both cases we leave the state of
nature through the social contract. Differentiate between their discussions
of the social contract.
- Is M L King a liberal political theorist? How does he conceive of rights and what does he
mean by legitimacy? Is his philosophy of non-violence part of the liberal tradition of a theorist
like J S Mill?
Last updated 7 December 1997
If you wish to comment: c-helm@wiu.edu