Religious Studies 454                                       Exam date: Wednesday, May 11

Religion and Violence                                       Exam time: 3:00pm

Spring 2005

 

REVIEW FOR FINAL EXAMINATION

 

Key Class Themes: the objective portion of the exam only covers the material since the second midterm: 

Web address: http://www.wiu.edu/users/mfjks  Sub-file = Religious Studies 454

1.      alternative religion process: “5 Ps”: prophet, promise, plan, possibility, place

2.      new religious movements: a new typology

3.      Under the Banner of Heaven: the basic people, themes, and issues in Krakauer’s book on the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and the fundamentalist Mormon groups

4.      Dr. Gordon Rand’s presentation on Krakauer’s book

5.      Juergensmeyer’s 5 possibilities; Kimball’s “inclusive faith rooted in tradition”

6.      Scientology

7.      Ramtha School of Enlightenment (if we get there)

 

 

The test covers the following material: The multiple choice and identification questions will be created from the PowerPoint notes for this section of the course and from Under the Banner of Heaven.  Please be familiar with the following file on the Web site:

 

New Religious Movements/Curing violence: new notes since the 2nd exam

Under the Banner of Heaven: Dr. Rand’s PowerPoint notes

       

Exam Format:

25 multiple choice questions worth one point each (please bring a #2 pencil and paper or “blue book” to the exam; 5 out of 8 short answer (one paragraph) identifications worth a possible two points each; one in-class essay question (see below) worth a possible 15 points for and exam total of 50 possible points.

 

Essay Question: you will be asked to write a four to five paragraph essay on the following question.  Once you have completed the multiple choice and short answer identification portion of the exam, you may take out a short outline and use it as a guide for your essay.

 

Question:  In reading Jon Krakauer’s, Under the Banner of Heaven, please provide at least three insights you gained into the causes of religion and violence.  Also, did Dr. Gordon Rand’s in-class rebuttal change your perspective on the book or our general theme of religion and violence?  If so, how?  If not, why not?

 

Best ‘o luck!